6 September 2008, 8:31 pm
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=796~2419~885~26~1002~515~1024&teams=7~11~7~5~5~5~5&te=&cash= Cleveland- gets Tinsley and Martin. I see Tinsley being Martin's Kidd (Tinsley is a very good passer, but other people on the Cavs can pick up the scoring slack) and Martin hopefully becoming the old Kenyon. Basically, I feel that Kenyon Martin has thrived when there is a good point guard as he had in New Jersey and in the early years in Denver with Andre. Admittedly, they'll be probably caught in many Denver stripclubs, but from a basketball standpoint, I believe this would be incentive for the King to stay. Mo Williams can move to SG. Those of you who say that he is too short to play SG must visit google and search up the words, "Jason Terry". They also get rid of Ben Wallace. Indiana- gets a relatively young PF to fill their hole that can also act as an expiring contract. The pacers also get rid of Tinsley, whom the organization hates. Denver- They get rid of Kenyon Martin in addition to around 7 million in bad contracts. They get an expiring contract in Snow and get the bad contract of Big Ben for two years rather than the equally disgusting Kenyon Martin contract for three years. With the amount of salary cap coming off in the next two years, the nuggets could even make a splash in the 2010 bidding wars and land perhaps another player from the class of 2003 to pair with Melo. Technically, this all assumes that Varejao will give his permission to go thru with this trade. Assuming that will happen, is this trade fair and reasonable to all sides? If there some minor problems, can you propose an adjusted one?... read more
Share on del.icio.us
Share on digg
Share on Technorati
Share on reddit
Share on Yahoo!
Share on Furl